6. Submit a Log

What went well - Why?
Discussing the word IMPACT in pairs and sharing out how this word related to our work in P2G - I think that gave everyone a greater sense of what their role was in the work.
What was a challenge - Why?
I think the extension pieces was the most challenging b/c they have not really begun coaching yet - it's early in our process.  However, we tweeked it a bit and talked about ourselves as coaches and watching our videos to reflect on identify, learn and improve.
What you will do next time?
Next time, I will pre-populate the frame with text boxes to make it easier and more time efficient for typing as they are talking and offering responses - picky thing, I know, but that was a challenge and a mis-step.
What adjustments you made?
Adding in for this audience to think about the frame in two ways - how it helps them learn the content, as well as think about students they are working with in P2G and thinking about if this routine would help support them in their learning.
Ideas generated for issues encountered?
Including text boxes next time for ease.

The Framing Routine is a clear and concise tool to use with learners.  The frame allows teachers and learners to organize the information in a logical and sensible order.  I used the Frame to introduce a new staff member to the MTSS framework.  I did not need to make any modifications in presentation or form.  The learner found the Frame helpful in pulling the MTSS framework together in a structured, visual format.  

The framing routine was one of the most simple to instruct and share with our participants.  The organizer gave a concrete look at what we want to cover over the course of a unit. It also makes 2nd and 3rd drafts easy as you make the decision to change details.  Our participants (teachers) looked at it as a great routine for young/new teachers to get their thoughts down before implementing a unit. 

Presented the following Frames to colleagues: Consonant Phoneme / Vowel Phoneme. These Frames were a complement to the Unit Organizer developed for the Phonemes in English. Each Frame extended / expanded participants' awareness of the intricate nature of phonemes.
(*CHALLENGE) Although the content was not familiar to participants, (*BENEFIT) the Frames helped organize information to draw attention to the similarities / differences among the speech sounds in English. Participants walked away from each session with a deeper understanding of the challenges inherent in teaching speech sounds to emergent readers. 
The Framing Routine can be a valuable tool for helping students / teachers see connections between ideas. Understanding how information is related helps to support internalization and use of the content addressed in each Frame. 
The Consonant / Vowel Phoneme Frames are 'good to go' as presented. This particular content and the tool (Frame device) complement each other.  

I think this organizes the information well and helps participants to visually see the sequence of teaching the verbal operants to their students. Since I will not be meeting with my targeted group of paraprofessionals again for several months, I recorded this session within colleague, so it did not feel as natural as it should.  When I do this with the group of paraprofesionals that this frame is intended for, I will add more examples of each operant related to their specific student, by doing this it will make the content more meaningful and relatable.

I introduced the FRAME with 2 SLPs, which was a somewhat contrived situation, due to my position as a consultant.  (I didn't have a training scheduled in order to introduce it to a larger group. ) I felt like the routine went well.  I think that when presenting to a class of students you work with on a daily basis, the Frame would be a great addition to help students to organize and remember information.  I will use this frame in the future with my LETRS module 2 training with teachers as well as college students I teach this information to,  once the information has been presented to give them background knowledge.  I like the organization of the frame and the connection it helps to make with the content presented.  I am sure that the next time I present it, I will become more fluent in the process and sound more natural.  It will also be a little more authentic when presenting to a group in a training or class. I think the frame will be a great tool to use as a review once the difficult material has been presented.  It will help the participants to review the information and organize it for increased learning.  

What went well: 
I posted the FRAME routine and it was accessible and made it visible to refer to throughout the lesson.
It was noted that the lesson was engaging and provided multiple opportunities for participants to respond. Finallly, the examples provided pertained to the key topic.

Challenges:
I thought the tool was user-friendly and easy to use so I didn't have any challenges at this time.

Adjustments:
I had to break down the concepts into two categories for Behavior and Course Performance so I may have a dotted lined drawn ahead of time to make that a little easier.
 I also found it was hard to write nicely or write large enough while teaching. I just need to adjust to that process and remember to write larger.