2. Foundation Framer - Nestling

Reflection 1

Only editable by group admins

  • Last updated August 29, 2019 at 7:47 AM
  • Evidence visible to public
Reflect on the process you’ve just worked through. Consider your decision-making throughout this process How do your instructional decisions, the technologies used, the teachers & students roles change as you describe your lesson at each SAMR level?

All posted evidence

TPACK lesson on addition up to 100

Many of the things that I included with the lesson I chose were similar to the ones I used in the in class example. Many times students use the same techniques for different lessons. In this particular lesson, I chose to use 1st grade and adding up to 100. Many times at the first grade level teachers are lecturing to get the lesson out and for students to begin understanding. Once the teacher is done demonstrating and showing students how it is done, student then take over. Students would then have to practice on their own using manipulatives, fingers, calculator, or paper to perfect the skill that was just taught. Therefore, at the beginning on the lesson students are listening while the teacher talks. Then it changes so that the teacher helps those struggling while the students demonstrate for themselves. 
This lesson would not be viewed as substitution because it is not substituting for anything else. 
It is considered argumentation because teachers are demonstrating a process that can be carried out to figure out an addition problem. 
It is considered modification because teachers are modifying students brain with adding more information about numbers. 
It is considered redefinition because it is redefining what the students already know. 
daughtermcguire About 3 years ago

TPACK/SAMR Model Reflection 1

Working through the TPACK process was a new experience of working on a lesson plan. Over the past year or so I have worked closely in our district with SAMR. So, having to think about pedagogy, content, and technology together was a little difficult at first. Once, I started thinking about the lesson and it all flowed together nicely. I believe this method of lesson planning would allow teachers to look differently at a simple lesson plan and implement this model to change it for the better of the students in each class. 

Using the SAMR model with lesson planning will allow teachers to take a deeper look at their lesson plans. Going through the lesson with each level of SAMR really makes you stop and think about what is best for the students. As I start out in the substitution level of the lesson plan it seems easy and like an old school approach to teach. This level has very little student engagement and might seem very boring to students. As we move into the augmentation stage of the lesson plan we start getting a little more engagement and class participation will go up. In using technology it automatically improves the engagement level, but be careful not all technology can be beneficial to each lesson. Following augmentation comes modification within the lesson. A form of modification with this lesson was using a video recording platform called Flipgrid. This allows teachers and students to hear each other's thoughts. Once you hear how someone explained a certain task and then having students responding to their peers causes great growth and learning in the classroom. Wrapping it up comes redefinition. Redefinition in the SAMR model can be difficult if you don’t perform too often. Here with this lesson having the students make brochures about all of their research and then sharing these brochures to the community via technology is huge for this generation. They will be able to reach so many in the community within our classroom!
oppyry About 3 years ago

Decision-Making Reflection

jkassebaum About 3 years ago

Reflection for TPACK

pbarnhar About 3 years ago

Turkupolis_Foundation Framer. Reflection 1.

kellit About 3 years ago

Reflection 1

I chose a lesson over drawing Lewis Structures in a chemistry 1 classroom. Typically, I would have a mini-lecture for my direct instruction, go over a few examples on the students' practice and turn them loose to work on the remaining problems on their own. 

In my lesson, as I moved through the SAMR model, I noted that the "S" and "A" models were still teacher-centered lessons. The whiteboards as augmentation for their practice give students a chance to draw their own structures and work through the processes. This level offers students a chance to compare their work with others.

In the "M" model, students have even more of an opportunity to collaborate with their peers through a canvas discussion. Instead of drawing a lewis structure, students would get a chance to comment on the flaws of a picture of a structure. This still offers a way for students to demonstrate their knowledge of lewis structures without having to actually draw them. The canvas post aspect also forces students to think for themselves as they cannot see other student's posts until they post themselves, instead of allowing another student to share the answer in a typical lecture.

Finally, the "R" model would utilize Flipgrid as a way for a student to record their own tutorial video on drawing Lewis Structures. Students are asked to demonstrate their knowledge by teaching someone else "how to".

The "M" and "R" models offer students more opportunities to create and collaborate with their peers rather than a teacher-centered lesson.

rzimmer4 About 3 years ago

TPACK/SAMR

alpinejer About 3 years ago

Reflection 1

I chose to give students two opportunities for technology use in this lesson. I made this lesson plan for a Biochemistry of Foods class and I think in this class it is more important for them to set up labs, do experiments, and use the tools they have in the kitchen. At the substitution level, they are just using MyPlate online rather than one that they could find on paper or in a book. By doing this, they learn how to locate it and use it for most or all of their meals. At the redefinition level, we would just use different tools in the kitchen that would allow the students to do something that they would not have been able to do before. This could be something like a dehydrator and we could make meat or it could be something as simple as a food processor to make hummus. 
bjsorensen Almost 4 years ago

Reflection 1 Part 2

Students can extend what they have learned by applying what they have learned in practice. Students often while I see them in practice, I will ask them questions about how they decided what they are doing in practice. From there I can listen and access how the students either understood the objective of the lesson or if they have any misconceptions. Which from that point I can pull them during group to do practice in the area where there is a gap.
kelloyd Almost 4 years ago

Reflection 1

This lesson is specific can be implemented with technology in many different ways for exploration. If students are interested in the phases of the moon or space in general there are so many resources out there for them to explore space and look at planets and stars. In my lesson, the S would be my direct instruction to the students explaining the general aspects of the moon and finding out what they already know and what they want to know about the moon. The A phase is where students can access their work through the canvas and also in the class. canvas has many linked videos to an exploration of the moon as it changes around the earth. The M phase incorporated the hands-on portion of the lesson. As the teacher, I have 3d printed models of the phases of the moon and they are to create their moon phases charts in class to have their own to reference whenever. The R phase is the students having their created moon phases along with the teachers model handy in class to share with peers and other teachers. 
jacoons Almost 4 years ago

Reflection 1

I chose to do a third-grade fractions lesson because this is a grade and lesson that I would teach. The key technology I chose to use is 3D printing because students can work together or with assistance to create a fractions model that they can hold and model with. At the S and A stage, it is very teacher-centered with passive learning from students. Once at the M and R stage, students are able to create and share out their models thus actively showing their knowledge. 
oliviacarlstedt Almost 4 years ago

I want to push my instruction to reach the modification and redefinition levels more successfully.

I find myself trying to find ways to reach each level, however that may be. I want to push my instruction to reach the modification and redefinition levels more successfully since I am such an advocate for technology, but sometimes I find that the amount of time I have to spent instructing students on how to actually use the technology first can be a deterrent.

The context and available technology definitely impacts the selection of different technologies. I work in a relatively wealthy school district, so the availability of personal devices like cell phones, tablets and laptops is more likely. However, we are still a public school district, so the availability of technology within the building is less so, or the technology may be outdated or low in number, so I find that in order to reach certain levels within SAMR, I really have to think outside the box.

I have to get way more creative personally to move up the SAMR framework. Substitution and augmentation are comfort zones for me, for sure. The more I attempt to modify or redefine instruction and use of technology for my students, the more I have to switch my own role from one of the teacher and authoritarian in the room to one of learning along with the kids, especially when it comes to getting hands-on.

I think the students’ roles change in a similar fashion. The lower the lesson is on the SAMR framework, the less thoughtful they have to be. But once they are given the opportunity to use technology in a way that immerses them in their content, they become more active and more critical.
jgilpatr Almost 4 years ago