Unit Organizer Routine (SP)

2. Demonstrate Implementation with Fidelity

Only editable by group admins

  • Last updated July 29, 2020 at 8:56 AM by kucrl
  • Evidence visible to public
Earn the Fidelity of Implementation Credential or post evidence of Fidelity of Implementation here.

Evidence includes:

Develop a Draft Unit Organizer

Develop and post a draft Unit Organizer related to content that predicts the instruction of the content with a group or a class. Follow the Get Ready section to prepare the draft. Practice applying the Linking Steps to develop the draft. Post your draft. 

Co-Construct and Instruct

Co-construct and instruct with the Unit Organizer using the Cue-Do-Review steps with a group or class. Follow the Get Set section to introduce the Unit Organizer to students.   

Use the Unit Organizer Routinely

Use the Unit Organizer routinely with a group or class. Follow the Go! and Win! sections of the guidebook.

Submit an Implementation Portfolio

Describe: • Group/Student (size, level, student characteristics, etc.) • The length of implementation (days, weeks, months, amount of time per day, days per week, etc.) Include artifacts: • Your draft and final Device • Student Devices without student names (HALO) • Post your implementation portfolio 

Submit a Log

Log: What went well - Why? What was a challenge - Why? What you will do next time What adjustments you made Ideas generated for issues encountered Etc. Post your log. 

Submit Video

Submit video to your professional developer that supports your competence. Show yourself conducting the Unit Organizer Routine, using the Cue-Do-Review process.   

If you would like to post your video to your credential (by posting a link to your video from Vimeo, YouTube, or another video hosting site) ensure that all permissions are in place or privacy settings are activated.  Posted video will be viewable by anyone who views this credential.  More than one video may be submitted to your professional developer for feedback or posted to your credential.  The video should show the Cue-Do-Review process.   Follow the Cue-Do-Review process outlined in the Cue-Do-Review Checklist. 

Note Completion Date

All posted evidence

Implimentation with Fidelity already achieved.

I completed the Implimentation with Fidelity and was awarded the badge on June 27, 2019.
agranata1 About 4 years ago

Explanation of the Unit Organizer.Morella

gmorella Over 4 years ago

Expanded Map part 2.Morella

gmorella Over 4 years ago

Expanded Unit Map part 1.Morella

gmorella Over 4 years ago

Front of Unit Organizer.Morella

gmorella Over 4 years ago

Unit Organizer Presentation

judyf About 5 years ago

Planning Guide

judyf About 5 years ago

Please see what I have uploaded for my Unit Organizer FI badge today.

sherri12 Over 5 years ago

This is the form from an observation of me implementing the unit organizer routine with my 8th grade science students.

swochs Over 5 years ago

My video

Google Drive

Mills re.mp4

coteach100 Over 5 years ago

Fidelity of Implementation Credential

Earned Fidelity of Implementation Badge on 3/6/19
cdblev Over 5 years ago

Implementation with Fidelity Evidence

If I were still working in the classroom as the primary instructor, I would use a unit organizer at the beginning of every unit of instruction in order to help my students understand the main learning goals for the unit as well as help them to organize the key information and see how it is all connected/related. Moreover, the extended unit organizer would help students create a study tool they could reference for periodic review and in preparation for assessments.

Implementation portfolio

Description of class:
21 students in a high school Algebra 1 class that was approximately 55 minutes in length

Duration of implementation:
This unit organizer was co-constructed during one class period and took approximately 42 minutes from start to finish. The co-construction was to activate prior knowledge of related content as well as introduce key vocabulary that would be used throughout the unit. Though the co-construction took longer than is “recommended,” I worked to help students make connections as we co-constructed, which is a key focus for NCTM standards. I believe having these discussions throughout the co-construction help students to see how content is related as well as give them a foundation from which to build as they proceed through the unit of instruction. I could have simply given students the information to fill into the unit organizer, which would significantly have decreased the time used to co-construct, but I believe that would also have decreased the value of using this content enhancement routine.
   

Submit a log

The co-construction that is portrayed in the video was well received by students. Though the class in which I completed this co-construction was not my own class (since I am no longer a classroom teacher) and because the students did not have a great familiarity with me, all students did engage in the co-construction and several participated by verbally providing key details for each key topic. Though the time period for this co-construction took longer than I intended (or is recommended), it appeared as if the students found this activity worthwhile.

Video link:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pfvHait9K6oDabSUrc0yzw3vjOK_s4Va

**Note: For some reason the video recorded, but the audio did not. I have had our IT person try to diagnose the problem, but he is not sure why this happened.  

Engage with coach

These are the observation notes and feedback provided to me by Hannah Sacra.

This document was completed during my implementation and co-construction with the class in the video. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kBf9_kiXbYlf034Kuwv_N2By97wH355e

This document was completed following my implementation and co-construction with the class in the video. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LRloyVHaKAuHkaIiNZjlPDop3L91gNYp  

Completion date:

Co-construction date: January 18, 2019
Submission date: January 27, 2019
lmmurphybrown Almost 6 years ago