Nerd Night Winter Quarter 2024
Title of Presentation: Acculturation of South Asian Youth: Generational Differences and Impacts on Psychological Well-being
Abstract of Presentation
Acculturation is a nonlinear process where individuals choose to connect their host culture and
their cultural identity, influencing cultural values, behaviors, family obligations and
psychological well-being including ethnic identity, self-esteem, and stress. Given that the host
culture typically has more power compared to the individual’s other cultural groups, it is
important to examine how acculturation strategies vary among different generations and
influence psychological well-being. This review of the literature aimed to examine whether
preferences for primary and secondary acculturation strategies between first generation (G1) and
second generation (G2) South Asian adolescents and young adults differentially affected their
psychological wellbeing.
The model driving this literature review is Berry’s 1974 Model of Acculturation, which proposed
four modes of acculturation: assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization.
Assimilation occurs when an individual does not wish to maintain their cultural identity.
Separation occurs when an individual does not wish to interact with members of the host culture
and maintain their own culture. Integration involves an individual maintaining their cultural
identity while interacting with the host culture. Finally, Marginalization occurs when an
individual is not interested in maintaining their culture of origin or interacting with the host
culture.
Based on previous studies with samples of South Asian adolescents and young adults, it was first
hypothesized that that the acculturation strategy of integration would be the primary and
preferred acculturation strategy of choice for G1 and G2 and will have a generally similar
positive effect on the psychological wellbeing of South Asian adolescents. It also was
hypothesized that G1 and G2 would choose different secondary acculturation strategies resulting
in differential impact on psychological well-being.
45 articles were reviewed, of which 20 were chosen to identify differences in primary and
secondary acculturation strategies between G1 and G2 South Asian adolescents and young
adults and possible differential impacts on their psychological wellbeing. Four databases,
including Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), PsycArticles, and JStor were
searched, with search terms including ‘Acculturation,’ ‘South Asian,’ ‘Generational
Differences,’ ‘First-Generation,’ ‘Second-Generation,’ ‘Psychological Well-Being,’ ‘Self
Esteem’, and ‘Ethnic Pride.’ Articles were initially screened by their title and abstract.
Publications were excluded if they did not include a discussion about psychological wellbeing,
including ethnic pride or self-esteem, or if the primary ethnic group focused on was not a
minority, preferably of Asian descent. Additionally, articles were excluded if they did not discuss
ingroup or outgroup characteristics, acculturation attitudes, or generational status.
Although the primary group of interest was South Asian adolescents living in the United States,
there were few studies that fit this criterion. Because of this limitation, various geographic
regions were included such as South Asian adolescents living in Europe, East Asia, and Oceania.
Preliminary results reveal differences between G1 and G2 youths’ preference for acculturation
strategies across different regions. For example, in Western countries like Canada, G1 and G2
youth prefer integration first, though the second choice of acculturation strategy varies between
separation (G1) and assimilation (G2). However, in East Asian countries like China, the primary
acculturation strategy of choice is marginalization. As described in Yoon et al (2013), integration
is positively correlated with positive psychological wellbeing, while marginalization is positively
correlated with negative psychological wellbeing.
Preliminary results also revealed differences between psychological wellbeing as it relates
todifferences in acculturation strategies and generational differences. Overall, primary choice of
acculturation strategy predicts self-esteem among Asian American adolescents and young
adults. In Western countries (where integration is the preferred acculturation strategy), G1 South
Asian immigrants’ acculturation-related in-group hassles contribute to psychological distress,
while G2 South Asian immigrants’ acculturation-related outgroup hassles contribute to
psychological distress.
It is important to examine the effects of preferred acculturation strategies on psychological
wellbeing, as acculturation heavily influences an individual’s identity. Individuals navigating this
complex process may experience identity conflicts or create a hybrid identity that integrates both
cultural influences. Acculturation has significant implications on an individual’s sense of self.
Understanding which acculturation strategy is used by an individual, and how that strategy may
positively or negatively impact their psychological well-being, can better inform how mental
health professionals tailor interventions that align with South Asian adolescents and young
adults’ unique cultural identity.
This review also revealed a gap in the literature. For example, while there has been research done
describing the effects of differences in acculturation strategies on the psychological wellbeing of
South Asian youth in Canada, the UK, New Zealand, Australia and Hong Kong, few studies have
examined these concepts for South Asian youth living in America. More often, acculturation
research done on South Asian immigrants in America uses adult populations. Research done on
non-South Asian G1 and G2 immigrant youth in America show that there are significant issues
with psychological wellbeing related to acculturation strategies. Given that South Asian youth is
a rapidly growing population in America, more research is needed for this group.
Future research questions should examine why there is a difference between acculturation
strategies regionally, but not so much generationally within the same region? Additional research
should also look at why acculturation strategies are the same between generations, and why are
there significant differences regarding psychological wellbeing (as it relates to acculturation)
within generations?