1. SIM Professional Developer or SpecialistPost the name of the SIM Professional Developer/Specialist who will partner with you in this process. More Info |
2. Develop a Draft Scientific Argumentation GuideDevelop and post a draft Scientific Argumentation Guide related to content that predicts the instruction of the content with a group or a class. Follow Chapter 2, Sections of the Guide to prepare the draft. Post your draft. More Info |
3. Co-Construct and InstructCo-construct and instruct using the Cue-Do-Review steps with a group or class. Follow the Using the Routine with Students section to introduce the Scientific Argumentation Routine to students. More Info |
4. Use Scientific Argumentation Guide RoutinelyUse the Scientific Argumentation Guide routinely with a group or class. More Info |
5. Submit Implementation PortfolioDescribe: •Group/Student (size, level, student characteristics, etc.) •Length of implementation (days, weeks, months, amount of time per day, days per week, etc.) Include artifacts: •Your draft and final devices •Student devices without student names (HALO) •Post your implementation portfolio More Info |
6. Submit a LogLog: •What went well - Why? •What was a challenge - Why? •What you will do next time •What adjustments you made •Ideas generated for issues encountered •Etc._Post your log._*****Optional: Submit a Student Interview (interview a student about usefulness and implementation)***** More Info |
7. Engage with CoachTell us about your coaching feedback and follow up. More Info |
8. Video and/or ObservationBe observed by your professional developer or specialist in person or by video conducting the Scientific Argumentation Routine, using the Cue-Do-Review process. Post the Cue-Do-Review Checklist from your professional developer. More Info |
9. Completion DatePost the date you completed the requirements for this micro-credential and then click on the "Request Feedback" button. More Info |