•What went well - Why?
The conversation went easily and naturally b/c the concepts compared were known deeply and the first session (PA and Phonics) was used to have the participants think about how they could be very clear with their learners when explaining the difference b/t the two.
•What was a challenge - Why? Finding a different category for the like/unlike characteristics was difficult to come up with b/c they were such discrete skills and their overarching category together seemed to be what the participants wanted to put here.
•What you will do next time - try to define how to create a like/unlike category more clearly.
•What adjustments you made - I tried to listen and go with the ideas presented by the participants rather than stay stuck on my draft.
•Ideas generated for issues encountered - participants had other additional ideas for extensions, which were interesting for the assessment table.
The conversation went easily and naturally b/c the concepts compared were known deeply and the first session (PA and Phonics) was used to have the participants think about how they could be very clear with their learners when explaining the difference b/t the two.
•What was a challenge - Why? Finding a different category for the like/unlike characteristics was difficult to come up with b/c they were such discrete skills and their overarching category together seemed to be what the participants wanted to put here.
•What you will do next time - try to define how to create a like/unlike category more clearly.
•What adjustments you made - I tried to listen and go with the ideas presented by the participants rather than stay stuck on my draft.
•Ideas generated for issues encountered - participants had other additional ideas for extensions, which were interesting for the assessment table.